Enrique Krauze

It is a type of pens to take, and seems that he still does not have who him has written a biography of to be able and of its power. It has not been with any type of gratuity which Enrique Krauze is accumulated like enterprise intellectual more politician than academic, because its academic education it is seen him of what History for him is done: interpreting it from the left with a reading from the right, the one of an adjective democracy without adjectives that in the correct friendly to please them and in the incorrect enemies to disqualify those that, distant or near of Alfonso Kings, Jose Vasconcelos, Martin Luis Guzmn and Octavio Peace, and than they could teach to the unconditional disciple which did not learn of Daniel Cosio Villegas: the intellectual entereza and critical independence, to consider of Lorenzo Meyer on the teacher Daniel Cosio Villegas, and what Enrique Krauze de Octavio learned Peace was to nearly work the distance with the Prince of the State. Enrique Krauze is not of the intellectuals whom some crisis undergoes of brings back to consciousness, since being enthroned to the power by means of the biographies of the power, the historical test that has served to him like great muleta in which it has leaned under the right armpit and thus to have taken his first steps with the foot straight ahead, abriendo to way to the position-the impostura of being a public man that public to the men has only done of the power, but not the man that is he before and the power: Krauze was not ably critical to ask the Poet Patriarch to him of the poetry and the Mexican poets who will move away of the political and economic power, because somehow she did not want to remain abandoned of the shade of the patriarch. .


Comments are closed.