Brazil is an emergent economy and in crisis times the economic agents who act with rational expectations will arrive in port resources in papers that give a good source to it of return. In the case problem in this logic does not exist, since that the external saving (that it generates the deficit in current transactions in the Rocking of Payments) finances the sector private, of which it will place these resources in the magnifying of portflios for new projects, therefore saving and investment are the same currency. The government survives of the resources promoted for the private sector of the economy. For this the tributes that are generated by the sources of circulation of good and merchandises of the companies to the families and of the source of income acquired for the families exist who offer its hand of workmanship to the companies who turn the wheel of the economy. What the government promotes in this circuit is to eliminate what it exists imperfections, that is, in the transistion of the merchandises between the agents, promoting infrastructure workmanships, for example, for circulation of the goods. When the government is the propellant biggest of economic well-being, it transcorre in error. First because it will choose who will receive the biggest parcel from resources, eliminating well-being of the other.
The improvement of one is the worsening of the other. Second that it will exactly burden the mechanism that more generates income, that is, the productive sector, mainly the industries. When explanar the ideas above, are mounted mote of the economic lines of direction macro that impactam directly in economic well-being of the Federal District. The economy of the federal capital total is directed to the public sector. The majority of the population yearns for a place to ' ' sol' ' for this maximizes its well-being with the stability promised for the public economic agent: the state.