The 1980s

What we call live, and if you can, live it up to the fullness. This reminds me of the gaguiano which, by the 1980s slogan – which rightly supposed to already-, we proposed a day in class: there are teachers that!! leverage life to teach the class, but there are teachers that take advantage of the class to give life. And I would deserve to be second. Great lesson of already deserved master. I wish I could be shared someday, even if it is not, we must not lose patience. Because, as the poet says, life and art are long and, Furthermore, it does not matter. Start as trance many times been required me simplicity and others as many times I’ve wondered how it is that, being or looking like the more universal, how being true our of the originary Esthetica, is not the easiest thing. Has it complicated us? Why? It is necessary to clarify, input, there is no take the Esthetica as an objectivity outside of us that must be penetrated by the intellect or what digest with the intellect.

There are infinite levels, as many as readers at all reading. Culture is, of itself, selective. If you want to, Aristocrat, and, best, dichroic. But, not comparatively, but variously. The original Esthetica is guaranteed been born in full, without taking the suspicion of some potential readers, beyond the backdrop of what was written in advance. Someday I already wrote, without wishing to bother, that misunderstanding of the Esthetica was not due to its complication, but the simplicity of his potential readers. Perhaps accept this better, if it comprises a fundamental axiom of the Esthetica: the invisible isn’t because we don’t see it, but because sees us. The mystery should not see it as limit or ribera? ste is the twist that carries all the difficulties. That is what is called boot, not already because we started us, but because we start.

Comments are closed.