Roman Empire

According to Weber, for terms the formation of a nescessrio serious State first that the catalizadora figure appeared of a prince. This serious one: ' ' a monopolizador agent of the activities privadas' '. The prince is the main tool that will place in practical what Weber calls: ' ' Expropriation of the particular ways of use of fora' '. In current terms we can say that this process was in the reality, a process of expropriation of the tools of domination and not only of ultilizao of the force, since the politics (that also it is a domination tool) also was expropriated or institutionalized for the state, thus removing of the people the power of influence inside of the main state decisions. This prince soon appears after the dismemberment of the Roman Empire in diverse feudal kingdoms. Inside of this conjuncture of feudalismo the prince represented only one to be able symbolic, since you feudal they exerted the true one to be able inside of domination of the limit of its lands.

It is clearly that this domination was had through a servitude process, that is, the individual was not enslaved and yes a worker the service of its susserano. But this feudal system that invigorated, was tax in one definitive way to the individual that it did not have alternative not to be to work for one gentleman, gave who it in exchange one supposed military protection. This process of expropriation of the particular army gave to the prince to be able to later monopolize other sectors and tools of social domination, as for example the religion. He is clearly that of beginning the religion catholic does not lose the autmia, but the prince inside of this process obtains of the church support to perpetuate itself there as authority joins, as much is that the Popes at a moment later, starts to crown the kings who in turn gained a character the holy ghost in this crown, being from representative of God in the land.


Comments are closed.